I claimed in this post that China is effectively forcing a current account deficit on the US by controlling the capital account balance. China can control their capital account balance with the US because China has capital controls in place but the US doesn’t. A commenter says:
“the post makes it sound as if the US is forced to consume Chinese goods. It’s not. To borrow from the RBA, a current account deficit is a matter for ‘consenting adults’. The US was one of those consenting adults.”
In the comments to that post Andy Harless has already given the answer, Andy replies:
“As a US citizen, I consent to my own purchases of Chinese goods but not to my neighbors’ purchases. So a current account deficit is not a matter for consenting adults, at least if “consent” means active consent. The US does give passive consent by not restricting imports or manipulating capital flows. “
Andy’s exactly right but I’ll rephrase it in my own words because hey, I want to contribute too. Part of Andy’s point is that there is a huge coordination problem here, how can everyone in America all agree to stop buying Chinese goods? This sort of thing has been tried before, there were “Buy American” campaigns against Japanese goods in the 80′s. I don’t think it had much effect in the 80′s but why not?
Well, there is incentive to deviate for everybody individually, it’s not an equilibrium outcome. That’s what Andy means saying “I consent to my own purchases of Chinese goods but not to my neighbors’ purchases”. If everyone else boycotts Chinese made goods then the economy gets just as much benefit as it does if I alone deviate and buy the cheaper goods. On the other hand, there is no way to exclude me from sharing in the benefits of higher domestic employment and wages. As long as everyone everyone else avoids the Chinese goods I’m better off buying them, and everyone else goes ahead and buys the Chinese goods then I’m also better off buying them since they are cheaper. Thus, buying from China is a dominant strategy.
There is just no way for the private sector to coordinate reduced purchases of Chinese stuff, the only way is for the government to intervene and affect the coordination.by introducing either capital controls or an import tariff to make the imports more expensive. Neither of these is a good idea though.
Adam Purzitsky
Senior Quantitative Portfolio Manager, Co-Fund Manager
Jul 25, 2010 at 10:03am
Buying imports from China is a growing trend. The opportunity to purchase high quality but inexpensive goods is an opportunity too good to pass up for many Canucks.
Many Canucks have become successful entrepreneurs by importing goods from China for resale in their local cities.
http://www.import-from-china-business.com
This is the original commenter. Adam, Andy, thank you both. The original post was very though provoking and I appreciate the discussion.
for future reference there is a theory called modern monetary theory (also known as chartalism) that is becoming more common in the blogosphere, popular discussion (see Jamie Galbraith's testimony in front of the deficit commission) and academic circles. i got here from a google alert for hyman minsky, who's had a profound influence on chartalism.
Ignis Rates Views moderates all comments. Comments that are abusive or off-topic will not be posted to the site. Excessively long comments may be moderated as well. Ignis Rates Views cannot facilitate requests to remove comments or explain individual moderation decisions.